2345 hack event(s)
Description of the event: A user mistakenly approved the SquidMulticall contract (instead of the intended Squid Router contract) with unlimited token allowances. An attacker then called the permissionless run() function on SquidMulticall with crafted calldata to execute transferFrom() from the victim’s approved tokens across multiple chains (ETH, BSC, Arbitrum, Avalanche, etc.). This drained approximately $517K.
Amount of loss: $ 517,000 Attack method: Approval Exploit
Description of the event: Computility-associated TGAI project on BSC suffered a reserve manipulation attack on PancakeSwap V2 liquidity pool. The hacker used a ~$2.4M USDT flash loan, deployed multiple helper contracts to buy TGAI, manipulated reserves via sync() function with ~17.5K USDT injection, then swapped to extract profits, resulting in approximately $11.94K loss.
Amount of loss: $ 11,940 Attack method: Reserve Manipulation Attack
Description of the event: Decentralized perpetual futures trading platform Denaria announced on X that it suffered a smart contract attack yesterday, resulting in a loss of approximately $165,000. The team is currently working with Linea and auditing partners to investigate the incident and will release a full post-mortem report as soon as possible.
Amount of loss: $ 165,000 Attack method: Smart Contract Vulnerability
Description of the event: According to ExVul monitoring, a TMM/USDT reserve manipulation attack occurred on the BSC (BNB Chain), resulting in a loss of approximately 1.665 million USDT. The attacker utilized flash loans from Lista DAO Moolah, Venus, Aave V3, PancakeSwap Vault, and Uniswap PoolManager to manipulate the TMM/USDT trading pair. By burning TMM to a dead address, the attacker reduced the pair's reserve to just 1 TMM, subsequently swapping 850 million TMM for approximately 272 million USDT. After repaying all flash loans, the attacker transferred a net profit of roughly 1.665 million USDT to associated addresses.
Amount of loss: $ 1,665,000 Attack method: Reserve Manipulation Attack
Description of the event: GoPlus has issued a security alert regarding a suspected cyberattack on Adobe, involving the potential leak of approximately 13 million users' data. Affected users may face heightened risks, including phishing emails or calls impersonating Adobe customer support, precision social engineering scams leveraging leaked ticket information, and credential stuffing attacks.
Amount of loss: 0 Attack method: Supply Chain Attack
Description of the event: DeFi lending protocol HypurrFi tweeted that the hypurr.fi domain has been hijacked. The team has migrated its infrastructure to hypurrfi .com. The protocol itself, user funds, and team infrastructure remain unaffected.
Amount of loss: 0 Attack method: Domain Hijacking
Description of the event: The attacker exploited a Misconfigured Oracle Exploit in combination with protocol logic issues to launch an attack against the Silo V2 contracts on Arbitrum. The incident involved price manipulation or configuration flaws in the oracle mechanism, which ultimately enabled unauthorized fund extraction. This was a relatively small-scale incident affecting Silo Finance V2, with limited impact on core user funds. Similar to other cases, the affected contracts were likely peripheral or experimental components rather than the core protocol. Following the attack, the stolen funds were obfuscated through mixers and/or cross-chain bridges. Although Silo Finance has undergone audits, newly introduced features or misconfigurations can still introduce potential risks.
Amount of loss: $ 392,000 Attack method: Oracle Misconfiguration
Description of the event: A user EOA on BNB Chain (with EIP-7702 delegation) that had set delegated code via an EIP-7702 Type-4 transaction was drained for ~$17.2K. The delegated code included a pancakeV3SwapCallback() function without proper access control. The attacker directly called this callback with crafted calldata, forcing the victim account to transfer its tokens to an attacker-controlled address. The victim had enabled the delegation to support swap-related logic.
Amount of loss: $ 17,200 Attack method: Smart Contract Vulnerability
Description of the event: According to ZachXBT, the Trust Wallet Discord vanity URL (discord[.]gg/trustwallet) has been hijacked and currently directs users to a phishing server. Users are advised to avoid using links from official channels—including the official website, Telegram, and blogs—to join the Discord at this time.
Amount of loss: 0 Attack method: Supply Chain Attack
Description of the event: The SAS Token on BNB Chain was exploited via a flawed custom transfer logic (Deferred Burn Exploit). The token’s custom transfer logic had a flaw: sending SAS to the LP pool only incremented a global sellBurn counter, while any subsequent ordinary transfer could burn SAS directly from the pool and call sync() to rewrite reserves, bypassing the AMM’s swap logic. The attacker accumulated sellBurn credit through sells, triggered an unrelated ordinary transfer to burn SAS from the pool down to ~1 wei, and then reverse-swapped to extract profit.
Amount of loss: $ 12,000 Attack method: Smart Contract Vulnerability
Description of the event: According to The Block, the Solana-based decentralized exchange Drift Protocol has been hit by a major exploit, with losses totaling at least $200 million. Some estimates suggest the figure is closer to $270 million, making it the second-largest DeFi security breach in the Solana ecosystem, trailing only the Wormhole bridge hack. The attack targeted multiple Drift vaults, including JLP Delta Neutral, SOL Super Staking, and BTC Super Staking. On-chain data reveals that the attacker swapped the stolen assets for USDC via Jupiter, then bridged them to Ethereum to purchase ETH. As of 17:45 UTC, the attacker held approximately 19,913 ETH (worth roughly $42 million). Drift stated they are currently investigating the "abnormal activity" and have advised users to suspend all deposits. Subsequently, according to PeckShield's statistics, Drift Protocol suffered losses exceeding $285 million in the attack.
Amount of loss: $ 285,000,000 Attack method: Social Engineering
Description of the event: A spokesperson for Galaxy Digital disclosed that the company recently contained a cybersecurity incident. Unauthorized access was strictly limited to an isolated development and testing environment; production systems, trading platforms, and customer accounts remained unaffected. The company quickly detected and contained the intrusion. The affected area was a standalone R&D environment unrelated to core infrastructure, resulting in a loss of less than $10,000 in corporate testing funds. Following a review, it was confirmed that no customer funds or account information were accessed or at risk, and all platforms and services remain fully operational. Galaxy stated they will continue to review the incident and provide updates as appropriate.
Amount of loss: $ 10,000 Attack method: Unknown
Description of the event: Huma Finance issued a warning on X stating that the official X account of its partner Arf, @arf_one, has been compromised. Please refrain from interacting with any posts from that account until it has been fully secured.
Amount of loss: 0 Attack method: Account Compromised
Description of the event: Socket has detected an active supply chain attack targeting version 1.14.1 of the core npm package, axios. The attacker injected malicious code into axios by introducing a malicious dependency that first appeared today. Developers using axios are advised to pin their versions immediately and review their project lockfiles.
Amount of loss: 0 Attack method: Supply Chain Attack
Description of the event: LML/USDT staking protocol on BNB Chain suffered a price manipulation attack. The hacker used flash loans to massively inflate the LML/USDT pool spot price, exploited a logic flaw in the staking contract’s reward calculation (which relied on a stale stored price with a 3600-second cooldown instead of live AMM price), batch-claimed oversized LML rewards from pre-staked addresses via EIP-7702, and sold them in the distorted pool for approximately $950,000 profit, causing the LML token price to crash 99.6%.
Amount of loss: $ 950,000 Attack method: Price Manipulation
Description of the event: Steakhouse Financial disclosed yesterday that it was targeted by a phone-based social engineering attack against its provider, OVH Cloud. The attacker modified the DNS A records of the main website and app subdomains to point to a malicious IP address and attempted to initiate a 5-day domain transfer. These changes have now been reverted, and the DNS records have been cleared. The team is currently working with OVH Cloud to fully resolve the issue. All vaults and smart contracts were not affected, and depositor funds remain safe. No other service accounts were compromised.Users are advised not to interact with the official website or emails until the issue is fully resolved. A detailed post-incident report will be released as soon as possible. Earlier today, Steakhouse Financial further stated that during the period when the website’s DNS records were cleared, vaults remained accessible directly via Morpho, with all functions — including deposits and withdrawals — operating normally. A confirmation will be provided once the frontend is fully restored.
Amount of loss: - Attack method: Social Engineering
Description of the event: Solana-based Prop AMM project GoonFi v2's WSOL/USDC pool was drained of ~$254k due to a program config/logic bug that caused mispricing. Searchers exploited the vulnerability in a single atomic transaction, and the project team has subsequently halted the program.
Amount of loss: $ 254,000 Attack method: Smart Contract Vulnerability
Description of the event: According to monitoring by BlockSec Phalcon, a suspicious transaction targeting an unknown contract (Stake) on the BSC chain has been detected, resulting in a loss of approximately $133,000. The attacker exploited a spot price dependency vulnerability within the Stake contract. By manipulating the price of TUR in the TUR-NOBEL pool and subsequently staking TUR, the attacker triggered reward calculations based on the artificially inflated price. They then claimed the amplified rewards through a referral account and ultimately profited by swapping the stolen TUR for USDT.
Amount of loss: $ 133,000 Attack method: Price Manipulation
Description of the event: According to The Block, DeFi lending protocol Moonwell is facing a governance attack on its Moonriver deployment, where an unknown attacker spent approximately $1,800 to acquire 40 million MFAM tokens and managed to buy, propose, and pass a initial vote within just 11 minutes. The attacker is seeking to transfer administrative control of seven lending markets, the comptroller, and the oracle to a malicious contract, which would enable the extraction of roughly $1.08 million in user funds. Although the proposal reached a quorum early on, "No" votes have since taken the lead, and while the voting is set to continue until March 27, the final outcome remains dependent on the remaining votes and community coordination.
Amount of loss: 0 Attack method: Governance Attack
Description of the event: SlowMist's CISO 23pds warned on X: "A major supply chain attack has hit LiteLLM (97M monthly downloads) via PyPI. Simply executing pip install litellm allows attackers to steal sensitive data: SSH keys, cloud logins (AWS/GCP/Azure), K8s configs, Git credentials, API keys, shell history, crypto wallets, and DB passwords."
Amount of loss: 0 Attack method: Supply Chain Attack