1916 hack event(s)
Description of the event: The official ether.fi Discord was hacked, and fraudulent messages containing scam links were posted. ether.fi urges users not to interact with any links within the Discord.
Amount of loss: - Attack method: Account Compromise
Description of the event: On June 6, 2025, ALEX Protocol was attacked due to a vulnerability in its on-chain self-listing verification logic, which is constrained by limitations on Stacks. As a result, multiple asset pools were drained, with total losses amounting to approximately $8.37 million.
Amount of loss: $ 8,370,000 Attack method: Contract Vulnerability
Description of the event: The Force Bridge, a cross-chain bridge on the Nervos Network, is suspected to have been compromised, with approximately $3.7 million in assets stolen. The Nervos team has urgently suspended all contracts and is actively investigating the incident. According to the incident investigation report, malicious code was discovered in one of the Docker images. The code had been injected into Ethereum-related modules and was not part of the public source code — instead, it was embedded through a locally built Docker image.
Amount of loss: $ 3,700,000 Attack method: Supply Chain Attack
Description of the event: MegaETH stated that its X (formerly Twitter) account has been compromised, warning users not to click on any links or view recent posts.
Amount of loss: - Attack method: Account Compromise
Description of the event: Lending protocol Malda tweeted that one of its contracts has been compromised and all contracts have been paused. Users are advised not to interact with any contracts until further notice.
Amount of loss: $ 281,000 Attack method: Contract Vulnerability
Description of the event: The vulnerability originated in the Migrator.sol contract. The contract allowed the Mendi Comptroller address to be passed dynamically, rather than being hardcoded. This enabled the attacker to supply their own malicious Comptroller, mint a synthetic position on Malda, and withdraw approximately $285,000.
Amount of loss: $ 285,000 Attack method: Contract Vulnerability
Description of the event: On May 28, SlowMist detected potential suspicious activity related to Cork Protocol. According to the SlowMist security team’s analysis, the root cause of the attack was the lack of strict validation on user-supplied data, allowing the protocol’s liquidity to be manipulated and transferred to unintended markets, which attackers then exploited to perform unauthorized redemptions and profit illegally.
Amount of loss: $ 12,000,000 Attack method: Contract Vulnerability
Description of the event: According to monitoring by SlowMist, Usual Protocol suffered a sophisticated arbitrage attack. The attacker exploited a price discrepancy between the protocol’s internal mechanisms and external markets. The core issue lay in the Vault system, which allowed a fixed 1:1 exchange between USD0++ and USD0—despite the two tokens trading at different prices on decentralized exchanges. The attacker strategically created a custom liquidity pool and manipulated the transaction path to trick the Vault into releasing USD0 tokens without receiving the expected sUSDS collateral. These USD0 tokens were then sold on external markets at prices higher than the internal rate, allowing the attacker to profit through arbitrage.
Amount of loss: $ 42,800 Attack method: Contract Vulnerability
Description of the event: On May 22, according to community reports, the SUI ecosystem’s liquidity provider Cetus Protocol was reportedly attacked. Liquidity pool depth dropped sharply, and multiple token pairs on Cetus experienced significant price declines. The estimated losses exceed $230 million. The project announced shortly after that $162 million of the funds had been frozen.
Amount of loss: $ 230,000,000 Attack method: Contract Vulnerability
Description of the event: According to monitoring by the SlowMist security team, the digital asset wealth management platform Nexo suffered a sandwich attack due to a lack of access control in one of its contracts, resulting in a loss of approximately $31,000.
Amount of loss: $ 31,535 Attack method: Contract Vulnerability
Description of the event: On May 16th, Demex's lending market Nitron was exploited, resulting in a loss of $950,559 in user funds. According to Demex's post-incident analysis, the root cause of the exploit was a donation-based oracle manipulation attack targeting the deprecated dGLP vault.
Amount of loss: $ 950,559 Attack method: Oracle Attack
Description of the event: Zunami Protocol has reported a hack in which the collateral for zunUSD and zunETH was stolen, resulting in a loss of approximately $500,000. The attacker has transferred the stolen funds to Tornado Cash.
Amount of loss: $ 500,000 Attack method: Unknown
Description of the event: ZKsync Developers posted on X that the official X accounts of both ZKsync and Matter Labs have been compromised. Please do not interact with these accounts or click on any related links.
Amount of loss: - Attack method: Account Compromise
Description of the event: The English football club @SheffieldUnited has confirmed that its official X account was hacked. The attacker posted a Solana token address.
Amount of loss: - Attack method: Account Compromise
Description of the event: Mobius Token on BSC is suspected to have been exploited, with estimated losses of $2.15 million.
Amount of loss: $ 2,150,000 Attack method: Contract Vulnerability
Description of the event: Cointelegraph’s official X account was reportedly compromised and used to send phishing links to contributors on the platform. Crypto KOL @thedefiedge reported receiving a DM from the account, asking him to review an article that allegedly mentioned him. When he clicked the link in a private browsing window, it prompted an X login — but the domain was “Cointetegraph,” a misspelled version of Cointelegraph. Previously, there were also market reports that Cointelegraph’s account had posted an on-chain token contract and disabled comments. That post has since been deleted.
Amount of loss: - Attack method: Account Compromise
Description of the event: According to on-chain investigator ZachXBT, crypto exchange BitoPro was reportedly hacked on May 8, 2025, resulting in losses of approximately $11.5 million. The attacker drained assets from BitoPro’s hot wallets on Tron, Ethereum, Solana, and Polygon, then sold them via DEXs. The stolen funds were subsequently laundered through Tornado Cash or bridged via Thorchain to the Bitcoin network, eventually ending up in a Wasabi Wallet. BitoPro stated that the tactics used in this incident closely resemble those seen in several major international cases, attributing the attack to the North Korean hacking group Lazarus.
Amount of loss: $ 11,500,000 Attack method: Malicious Software
Description of the event: Curve Finance’s official website and X account were compromised in quick succession. On May 5, attackers first took control of the project’s X account and used it to post a phishing message promoting a fake airdrop. Then on May 12, the project issued a warning that the Curve frontend had been “hijacked,” in what appeared to be a domain takeover incident.
Amount of loss: - Attack method: Account Compromise
Description of the event: TRON DAO stated on X that its account was compromised on May 2, 2025, at 9:25 AM PST. During the breach, an unauthorized party published a post containing contract address, sent private messages, and followed several unknown accounts.
Amount of loss: - Attack method: Account Compromise
Description of the event: Hyperliquid's X account is suspected to have been compromised. Please do not trust any content it posts or click on any links, to avoid potential losses.
Amount of loss: - Attack method: Account Compromise